History Of The Book Of Esther
The question of whether the Book of Esther belongs in the canon of Scripture has been raised from the early period by both Edomite Jews and Christians. The Book of Esther is one of a small literary group of Books (along with Tobit and Judith) with very distinctive characteristics, and text which is difficult to determine. The book has two forms: one long, the Hebrew; one short, in the Greek.
The Greek text there are two principal types: that of the current Greek Bible and that of the widely variant recension of Lucian of Antioch. Six additional chapters with an extra 107 verses appear interspersed in the Septuagint (LXX), the Greek translation of the Old Testament, but do not appear in the Protestant canon. The Greek version contains the following passages not found in the Hebrew:
- the dream of Mordecai, 1:1,
- and its explanation, 10:3;
- two edicts of Ahasuerus, 3:13 and 8:12;
- the prayer of Mordecai, 4:17;
- the prayer of Esther, 4:17;
- a second account of Esther’s appeal to Ahasuerus, 5:1, and 5:2;
- an appendix explaining the origin of the Greek version, 10:3.
- Jerome placed his translation of these passages after the translated Hebrew text (Vulg. 10:4-16:24).
The book belongs to a type of literature which treats history and geography with a good deal of ‘Freedom.’
In the Hebrew version, Haman is called an Agagite (Amalekite), but in the Greek, he is a Macedonian, two totally different races. Both can’t be right!
The lecturer is a White Nationalist, a philosophy I strongly oppose and believe it to be hateful and against the Law of Yah. With that said, he does bring quite a bit more facts and information to the table, more so than the hireling “Scholars”; The majority of which are Jew.
For the record, Israel is not a “race”. We are a nation of people who are in covenant with Almighty Yah. ALL races, nationalities, WHO ARE HUMAN (Image Bearers) are being called to enter into His Kingdom.
William Finck is building upon the trail blazer Bertrand Comparet
Main Points of Article
- 2 versions: Greek and Hebrew
- Likely written at the late date of 135-104 BC, Antiochus IV Epiphanes (Esther 2:5-6)
- LaSor et al affirm that Esther was not officially recognized as Scripture by Christians until A. D. 397 at the council of Carthage (LaSor, Hubbard, and Bush, Old Testament Survey, 627, n. 7).
- Was not accepted at the time of Yeshua
- Was not found in the Dead Sea Scrolls
- Ezra did not canonize it
- Was not canonized at the time of Josephus
- The New Testament does not quote it
- Its not actual history, its a fable (Contradicts Persian history and Law)
- The book is absence from the the earliest lists of canonical books
- lack of citation in the NT & OT or other ancient writings
- lack of references to Elohim
- lack of religious practices
- excessive anti-Torah Jewish nationalism
- spirit of vengeance have troubled believers for millennia.
- It never mentions the Name of YHWH once, nor Elohim.
- It doesn’t mention worship, prayer or sacrifice, does mention “fasting” but not prayer.
- In the text there’s no thanksgiving to יהוה for deliverance
- none of the characters in the book are mentioned in any other books in scripture or in any historical records (outside the Talmud and rabbinical kabbalah of course).
- NO early Christian churches accepted the books’ canonicity.
- Mordecai is of the tribe of Benjamin. Ester 2:5. Mordecai was not a jew. Neither was Esther.
- Book of Esther is used as a signature of Nephilim terrorism: Stuxnet
- Esther in Iran nuclear centrifuge
- Book of Esther given to Obama from Bibi in 2010
- 51 times Esther references “Jew” which is a mistranslation of “Judahite” (true worshiper of Yah)
- Holy day for Jewish blood libel, or Jewish ritual murders (Andrenochrome)
- Martin Luther doubted the book of Esther’s canonicity.
- The Great Synagogue, consisting of 120 rabbinical scholars, canonized the Hebrew Book of Esther as Scripture but only after a redaction had been made of an original work written allegedly by Mordecai himself (cp. Esther 9:20,32). Why did this Council create a redaction? Why did they not leave the original writing of Mordecai unedited?
Esther lacks Torah Morals
The author of Esther doesn’t criticize the divisive and wicked means employed for victory nor does the author engage in any moral reflection about the massive genocide or the motive. These are some of the reasons why down through history that many considered the Book of Esther interesting literature, a story, but didn’t give it ’Scriptural validity, or place any value on it. They didn’t believe it had any historical basis, and considered the book in the ranks of the Books of Tobit, and Judith a collection of interesting literary tales, but nothing more.
2:9 Esther’s reception of special portions of food is in direct contrast with the prophet Daniel. Unlike Daniel, Esther didn’t follow the dietary commandments, she was fully assimilated.
The Book of Esther is not Prophetic
It would be a tragic mistake for any believer to consider the events depicted in this book as models for behavior for worshipers of the Almighty or for unveiling prophecy and timelines, and this is the rub, many believers celebrate Purim is if it were because their teachers teach it as if it’s going to become prophecy in involving……you guessed it the altar and the Levites and the Temple Mount.
The Name “Esther” is a Pagan god
A form of Ishtar the Babylonian sex goddess known today as Easter.
Some say that Esther derives from the Persian word starer meaning star/ hidden star. ‘The Star of David’ (Star of Remphan). Esther and Mystery Babylon from the Book of Revelation are one and the same!
Mordachai is the name of a Pagan god
From “Marduk”, the Babylonian city-god. “Mardukaya” was his Babylonian personal name which meant, “a little man” or “worshipper of Mars”.
The Prophet Daniel stated there were 120 provinces, Eshter 1;1 says 127.
No historical record of Vashti.
(1) Edomite Jews establish modus operandi from Esther
7:4 Esther conceives the tactic of arguing that Haman’s financial offer in 3:9 wouldn’t ever compensate for the kings damages of lost revenues from the Jews. This tactic was later employed in 1180 in France and 1290 in England to thwart Jewish expulsion, ‘the royals would never recover lost revenues from the Jews’.
(2) Edomite Jews establish modus operandi from Esther
The pawn-shop banking tactics of Torah forbidden “usury” employed in Esther 7:4 were used extensively by the Canaanite Nephilim (Phonetician) and Edomite hybrids through history and comes all the way forward to The Federal Reserve Bank, it’s a consortium of 9 Zionist Edomite Jewish-owned & associated banks with the Rothschilds at the head:
$1. Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin.
$2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris.
$3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy.
$4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam.
$5. Lehman Brothers of NY.
$6. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of NY (Now Shearson American Express).
$7. Goldman, Sachs of NY.
$8. National Bank of Commerce NY/Morgan Guaranty Trust (J. P. Morgan Bank –
Equitable Life – Levi P. Morton are principal shareholders).
$9. Hanover Trust of NY (William and David Rockefeller & Chase National Bank NY are principal shareholders).
5 Hidden Acrostics
1:20 ‘all the wives shall give’ יהוה backwards – this is a backwards story! backwards & forwards you won’t know whether you’re coming or going! (5:4, 5:13, 7:7).
The Old Testament Canonization was closed after Ezra
When the Roman army leveled the Temple, in 70 A.D., Edomite Jewish religious practice was upended. Their system of sacrificial ritual ended with the destruction of the Temple. It was commonly believed that Ezra’s time marked the end of divine inspiration, so there was no reason to not close the canon. There was a lot of questionable religious material in circulation during that time. Mostly Gnostic and Edomite Pharisaic religionists.
The writing had to be composed before the time of Ezra, for it was popularly believed that inspiration had ceased then. Jonah was accepted because it used the name of an early prophet and dealt with events before the destruction of Nineveh, which occurred in 612. Daniel, a pseudonymous writing, had its setting in the Exile and therefore was accepted as an Exilic document.” (Gerald A. Larue, “Old Testament Life and Literature”, Allyn And Bacon (1968, 1997), electronic version © 1997 by Internet Infidels).
In Judaism Discovered by Michael Hoffman
‘The Spring festival of Purim is a pagan holiday in Jerusalem characterized by “bacchanalian scenes of drunken cavorting, Halloween style clothing and masks, Talmudic men cross-dressed as women and a general Topsy-turvy, ‘Lord of Misrule’ ambiance.“
The Secret of Purim
Judaism’s Purim holy day embodies a number of hidden aspects of rabbinic psychology pertaining to directives to exterminate non-Jews (Haman and his sons) because they were going to exterminate the Jews. Always that alibi, going back to Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai: ‘we are only exterminating the exterminators.’ Apparently, the rabbis cannot or will not see that this type of thinking perpetuates demonic cycles of violence. Various nations of goyim are candidates for collective guilt and mass extermination on this basis: German civilians and now the Arab people. To understand the basis of this in the religious festival of Purim some background is necessary.
First let us recall that Purim is ascribed to the Biblical Book of Esther but in Judaism it is heavily embroidered with Midrashic fantasies and Talmudic glosses. According to Rashi, citing the Seder Olam, the real crime of Haman’s sons was that they “successfully conspired to stop the Jews from rebuilding the Temple.” Rebuilding the Temple was not resumed until after Haman and his sons were annihilated. Thus anyone today who opposes the rebuilding of the Temple at Jerusalem is, in the eyes of Orthodox rabbis, another Haman, subject to extermination. In Talmudic lore, Haman is identified as a descendant of Amalek:
“The Gemara (Chullin 139b) asks, ‘Where is there an allusion to Haman in the Torah? As it is written (Bereishis 3:11), ‘Have you perhaps eaten from the Tree (Ha-min ha-eitz) from which I told you not to eat?…’ The word Hamin (‘perhaps from’) is spelled (in Hebrew) with the same letters as Haman. At first inspection, this appears to be a simple play on words. Upon reflection, however, we will find that there is more to this ‘simple allusion’ than meets the eye…. the Gemara’s question was: Where do we find Haman in the Torah? If, in its answer, the Gemara points us towards this verse, we may assume that it embodies the very essence of the mysterious Jew-hater called Haman. Haman, we know, was a descendent of Amalek.”
Rabbi Shraga Simmons, in “Haman: Heir to Amalek” states about Purim,
“At no time of the Jewish year is the synagogue as ‘wild’ as during the Megillah reading: Every time Haman’s name is read, the congregation erupts in a deafening chorus of groggers, clanging pots, cap-guns and sirens. Some write
Haman’s name on the bottom of their shoes and stomp it out. Others write his name in wax and melt it! Who was Haman, and why the obsession with blotting out his name? To understand, we have to go back to the time of Jacob our forefather. Jacob had a twin brother Esav, who was a lifelong rival — so much forefather. Jacob had a twin brother Esav, who was a lifelong rival — so much so that Esav sought to kill Jacob…The Midrash says that when Esav was getting old, he called in his grandson Amalek and said: ‘I tried to kill Jacob but was unable. Now I am entrusting you and your descendants with the important mission of annihilating Jacob’s descendants — the Jewish people. Carry out this deed for me. Be relentless and do not show mercy.’ True to his mission, Amalek has historically tried to destroy the Jews…So what does Amalek have to do with Purim? The Scroll of Esther (3:1) identifies Haman as the descendent of Agag, King of Amalek. Haman’s desire to wipe out the Jewish people was an expression of his long-standing national tradition.”
Contemporary Freemasons, Zionists and Talmudists identify Palestinians and Arabs generally as the descendants of Amalek and Haman, who are obstructing the building of the Third Temple and deserving of annihilation for this “offense.” Drunken Halloween Grotesquerie Conceals the Secret of Hester Panim (Hiding face).
As in all totalitarian systems, someone is always trying to get free of the ideological prison that is Talmudism and Zionism. Many sincerely desire an alternative to a life of hyper-regimentation, institutionalized criminality and destructive hatred. By analyzing the hidden psychology of “Purimspiel” one discovers the means by which the modern “Sanhedrin” prevents this liberation by keeping Judaic people in subjection, while enforcing their obedience to stifling Talmudic conformity and even racial segregation.
The spring festival of Purim is a pagan holiday in Judaism. We recommend that readers visit Orthodox Hasidic neighborhoods during Purim. Those who do so will be shocked to witness Bacchanalian scenes of drunken cavorting, grotesquely pagan, Halloween-style clothing and masks, Talmudic men cross-dressed as women and a general topsy-turvy, “Lord of Misrule” ambiance.
What kind of “Biblical” religion issues a pious decree to its male members to get drunk on alcohol as part of the “holiness” of the day? Yet there is more that is evil about Purim than just public intoxication and pagan attire. Purim enshrines the role of the hereditary oppressor (in this case “Haman”) as part of a function of keeping Judaic people subservient to Judaism’s religious and political rabbinic overseers.
In the arcane Talmudic and Kabbalistic “Hester Panim” psychology of Purim, a certain amount of violent persecution of Judaic people is regarded as desirable for maintaining the loyalty of Judaics to their duplicitous and corrupt leaders. The rabbis believe that without such anti-Judaic violence, Judaic people will wander from the rabbinic fold, marry a shiksa (“female abomination,” i.e. a gentile woman) or one of the shkotzim (male gentiles of a kind sometimes used for sex by Orthodox Judaic homosexuals), and assimilate gentile ways, all of which are regarded as calamities.
This hidden aspect of Purim can be traced to the Talmudic command to get drunk on Purim. This injunction is an allusion to the revelation of a secret. The Talmud observes that “when wine goes in, secrets come out.” The esoteric Kabbalistic understanding is that the Judiac is to become “intoxicated” on the secret within Purim itself, i.e., the conjunction of opposites, the occult union of Mordechai the advocate for Judaism, and Haman, the would-be exterminator of Edomite Jews. Judaics are commanded to blur the distinctions between the two as a lesson in the arcane truth that both Haman and Mordecai serve the purposes of Judaism.
Therefore, where no violent anti-Judaic persecution exists, the rabbis have found it necessary to foment and bankroll it, a fact perhaps unknown by those throughout history who have advocated or implemented vigilante, military or other violence against non-criminal and non-combatant Judaic people. By so doing, the fables associated with Adolf Hitler and his partisans only strengthened the stranglehold of the Talmudic ruling class — whether Zionist or rabbinic — over Judaic people. Although the criminal and supremacist character of both Judaism and Zionism cannot be gainsaid, we freely acknowledge that there are numerous Judaic individuals described as “Jews” who embrace neither crime nor supremacism, and who are not engaged in any kind of antiChristian activity. Moreover, even with regard to the arch-criminals who crucified Him, Jesus believed that it was sufficient to boldly speak the truth about them. Any other remedy was left to Divine Providence and due process of law (Romans 12:19 and 13:4). Purim was freilach (Yiddish for “happy”)!
Avi Becker, former Secretary-General of the World Jewish Congress observed:
“…in the mid-19th century, Rabbi (Samson Raphael) Hirsch, the leader of Germany’s Orthodox Jews, wrote that antiSemitism is the tool through which the God of Israel preserves his people… AntiSemitism’s historic role in preserving the Jewish people is essentially a sociological phenomenon that is also found among other collectives: External hostility crystallizes group identity and nurtures unity and solidarity … (Binyamin Ze’ev) Herzl wrote in his diary that ‘we are one nation — because that is what our enemies have made us, against our will… And if they had left us in peace, we would have merged into the surrounding environment and disappeared.”
Consequently, the Hamans and the Hitlers are indispensable to the rabbis in service to this very function. When necessary to augment their power and control, the rabbis seek to clandestinely encourage another violent “Jew hater,” another Haman, Hitler or Osama bin Laden to serve their cause. With regard to bin Laden, the power and prestige of Judaism and Zionism have increased exponentially since the Sept, 11, 2001 Massad terror attacks on America. As if to signal that bin Laden was Zionism’s agent, the Israeli newspaper Hamodia pictured him dressed as a Chabad Lubavitcher Judaic.
Jewish Encyclopedia acknowledges: ‘too many improbabilities for The Book of Esther to be true.’
It points out 5 major Improbabilities of the Story.
• 1. It’s generally recognized that the Ahasuerus ( ), mentioned in the book
of Esther, in Ezra 4. 6, and in Dan. 9. 1, is identical with the Persian king known
as Xerxes (Ξέρζης, “Khshayarha”), who reigned from 485 to 464 B.C.; but it’s
impossible to find any historical parallel for a Jewish consort to this king. Some
critics formerly identified Esther with Amastris (Ionic, “Amestris”), who is
mentioned by Herodotus as the queen of Xerxes at the time when Esther,
according to Esth. 2. 6, became the wife of Ahasuerus. Amastris, however, was
the daughter of a Persian general and, therefore, not a Jewess. The facts of
Amastris’ reign doesn’t agree with the Biblical story of Esther. Besides all this, it’s impossible to connect the two names etymologically. M’Clymont (Hastings, “Dict. Bible,” i. 772) thinks it possible that Esther and Vashti may have been merely the chief favorites of the harem, and are consequently not mentioned in parallel historical accounts.
In either case there is no historical record of a Queen Vashti or Esther.
It is very doubtful whether the haughty Persian aristocracy, always highly influential with the monarch, would have tolerated the choice of a Jewish queen and a Jewish prime minister (Mordecai), to the exclusion of their own class—not to speak of the improbability of the prime ministry of Haman the Agagite, who preceded Mordecai. “Agagite” can only be interpreted here as synonymous with “Amalekite”.
Oppert’s attempt to connect the term “Agagite” with “Agaz,” a Median tribe mentioned by Sargon, can not be taken seriously. The term, as applied to Haman, is a gross anachronism; and the author of Esther no doubt used it intentionally as a fitting name for an enemy of Israel. In the Greek version of Esther, Haman is called a Macedonian.
• 2. Perhaps the most striking point against the historical value of the Book of
Esther is the remarkable decree permitting the Jews to massacre their enemies
and the native citizenry of the Persian empire during a period of two days. If such an extraordinary event had actually taken place, should not someone of the time period recorded the 75,000 slaughtered in the Biblical account. There is an ocean of records from the Achaemenian dynasty, yet we cant produce not one single hint accounting for this huge causality? Again, could the king have withstood the attitude of the native nobles, who would hardly have looked upon such an occurrence without offering armed resistance to their feeble and capricious sovereign? A similar objection may be made against the probability of the first edict permitting Haman the Amalekite to massacre all the Jews. Would there not be some confirmation of it in parallel records? This whole section bears the stamp of free invention.
• 3. Extraordinary also is the statement that Esther didn’t reveal her Jewish origin when she was chosen queen (ii. 10), although it was known that she came from the house of Mordecai, who was a professing Jew (iii. 4), and that she maintained a constant communication with him from the harem (iv. 4-17).
• 4. Hardly less striking is the description of the Jews by Haman as being “dispersed among the people in all provinces of thy kingdom” and as disobedient “to the king’s laws” (iii. 8). This certainly applies more to the Greek than to the Persian period, in which the Diaspora had not yet begun and during which there is no record of rebellious tendencies on the part of the Jews against the royal authority.
• 5. Finally, in this connection, the author’s knowledge of Persian customs is not in keeping with contemporary records. The chief conflicting points are as follows:
(a) Mordecai was permitted free access to his cousin in the harem, a state of
affairs wholly at variance with Oriental usage, both ancient and modern.
(b) The queen could not send a message to her own husband (!).
(c) The division of the empire into 127 provinces contrasts strangely with the twenty historical Persian satrapies.
(d) The fact that Haman tolerated for a long time Mordecai’s refusal to do obeisance is hardly in accordance with the customs of the East. Any native venturing to stand in the presence of a Turkish grand vizier would certainly be severely dealt with without delay.
(e) This very refusal of Mordecai to prostrate himself belongs rather to the Greek than to the earlier Oriental period, when such an act would have involved no personal degradation (compare Gen. xxiii. 7, xxxiii. 3; Herodotus, vii. 136).
(f) Most of the proper names in Esther which are given as Persian appear to be rather of Semitic than of Iranian origin, in spite of Oppert’s attempt to explain many of them from the Persian
20th Century Purim Feasts’
The show trial of the German Nazis tried at Nuremberg in 1946 was a Purim
extravaganza. It began with the defendants being unmercifully tortured and beaten in their cells. All were forced to make false confessions and exactly ten prisoners were hung on the gallows. Just like in the book of Esther with the ten sons of Haman being hung.
David Irving on the Lies of the Nuremberg Trials
Julius Streicher, was one of the ten hung at Nuremberg. Interestingly, it was not officially on Purim fest when the ten Germans were hung. But Streicher’s last words before being hung on the gallows stunned onlookers. He declared: “This is my celebration of Purim 1946. I am now going to God. The Bolshevists will hang you all one day…”
Then in March 1986, The Jewish Observer, a Jewish publication, bragged that the ten Nazis killed at Nuremberg for their “crimes” against the Jews had been found guilty of “modern Hamanism.”
Colonel Donn de Grande Pré, writes in Barbarians Inside the Gates, “One must read the Book of Esther in the Bible to fully understand the implications of the Nuremberg trials.”
Saddam Hussein and his son’s were viewed as a modern day Haman and his son’s! After the “Highway of Death” massacre, President Bush ordered a cessation of hostilities. The war ended on February 28, 1991. February 28, 1991, was the Jewish Festival of Purim! This fact means that the slaughter of these fleeing Iraqi soldiers occurred on Purim, 1991!
The 48 hour ultimatum to Saddam and his sons precisely paralleled the Jewish holiday, Purim.
At 8:15pm, Eastern Standard Time, on March 17 2003, the president appeared on TV to announce a 48-hour ultimatum to Saddam Hussein to leave the country with his sons, or suffer the invasion. Thus, the 48-hour ultimatum expired at 8:15pm., EST, March 19.
In Israeli time, President Bush appeared on TV at 3:15am on March 18 and the deadline expired at 3:15am, March 20.
Purim was celebrated that year from Sundown, March 17 through March 19. In fact, the Purim celebration that year is comprised of the following events:
March 17 — Ta’anit Esther — a feast to Queen Esther, the heroine of Purim
March 18 — Purim
March 19 — Shushan Purim — the day Purim is celebrated in Jerusalem and other cities
Thus, the entire 48-hour ultimatum to Saddam Hussein occurred precisely during the time of the Purim celebration!
You can see that President Bush deliberately chose March 20, 2003, Purim Day, as the start of his war against Iraq because of important occult rites of the Edomite Jews.
A Question about Haman’s son’s
If Haman’s 10 sons had already been killed (9:12), how could they be hanged the next day (“tomorrow” 9:13)?
Exposing hate, racism and intolerance
The violence in the Book of Esther is a kind of civil war, which Cicero called “the worst of all calamities.”
Theodosius II [Byzantine Emperor 408-450] put an end to these indecent scenes by the enactment of a law prohibiting the festival.” (p.43) “There is no single fact in history more clearly obvious than the peculiar animosity of the Jews for all peoples other than their own. It is only to be understood on the basis of the almost incredible obsession of race superiority — the myth of the chosen people. The general antagonism against all Gentiles in general is surpassed only by the Jewish hatred of Christianity in particular.”
From its inception Zionism has a symbiotic relationship with anti-Semitism, Judaism and Zionism. Leo Pinksker, perhaps the first to articulate political Zionist, argued in his 1882 book Auto-Emancipation that Judeophobia is intractable.
As a physic aberration, it is hereditary, as a disease transmitted for two thousand years, it’s incurable. The Kabbalistic secret of Purim is that the Hitlers and Saddam’s of the world make the advancement of the Judaic “equilibrium” possible; without violent, implacable opposition to and hatred of all Jewish persons, including law-abiding ones of good will, the rabbinic work cannot advance!
From Bar Illan Jewish University In Synagogues Jewish children beat willow branches to symbolize the beating of
Haman, they beat, whip and hang life size dolls of Haman. What’s really disturbing is Messianics get caught up in the most sickening act of Purim the symbolic eating of Hamans ears (after he was decapitated by the Jews).
Cross dressing: Rabbi Shlomo Ephraim Lontshitz (one of the great rabbis of Prague at the time of the Rama) spoke out against the custom of cross-dressing in his book Olelot Ephraim (Article 309), seeing that on Purim “they change their nature by putting masks on their faces till they become someone else and no one knows them since they all have costumes and they become women since a man wears women’s clothes and all the women put a mask on their faces so that those who see them do not recognize or know them or understand who’s who … should this be the nature of a day of festivity and favor before God? And what source have they for these improper customs?”
Special Delicacies For the festive meal of Purim as well as for the other meals of the holiday, special dishes which somehow hint at the miracle of Purim, are customary.
- “Haman Taschen” (Oznei Haman = Haman’s Ears): In the Ashkenazi communities these triangular baked pockets filled with poppy seed or other sweet fillings are ever present. The custom originates in, Ashkenaz (Germany). They have become the most well known and widespread Purim delicacy in all communities the world over. (Today liberal Jewry tries to cover up this fact and tell gullible gentiles that these triangular fruit-filled cookies are really only supposed to represent Haman’s three-cornered hat).
- “Kreplach”: chopped meat covered with dough, also triangular in shape. The name has received a popular etymology: “Kreplach are eaten only on days on which there is both hitting and eating: Purim – the (symbolical) beating of Haman’s flesh”.
- Many Fish Dishes are eaten on Purim because Pisces (Astrological Fish) is the sign of the month of Adar. Purim is meant to stir hate and mistrust into the Jewish heart against the gentile world, with the booing and hissing and hate filled synagogue services.
Esther Represents Jewish Crimes
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds two letters, one of which he read from, as he addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference in Washington, on March 5, 2012.
“When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave President Obama the Book of Esther as a gift a few days ago, the message was only slightly less subtle than if he had constructed a massive neon billboard across the street from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with the message “Mr. President, please help me destroy Iran before they destroy us.”
The first paragraph of the newspaper article reads as follows:
Esther tells of a Persian plot against the Jews that was thwarted through cunning and the intercession of a gentile king. Purim, the holiday that celebrates the story, starts tonight.
Netanyahu intimates that the supposed Jews of 2,500 years ago outsmarted a Gentile king, causing him to kill his own Gentile people. Netanyahu is using this story as a parable to suggest that the Jews of today are also outsmarting the Gentiles, mind-controlling them into killing their own Gentile people.
Netanyahu gloats that the United States, a nation of purported Christians, is foolish enough to support Israel in their annihilation of the “Gentile” Palestinians. And the U.S. Congress has given billions of dollars to Israel which the Israelis are using to
- 1) buy our Congress – and thus control our country,
- 2) help themselves to our technology, including weapons technology,
- 3) arm themselves to the teeth with nuclear weapons while denying nuclear weapons to every Arab country,
- 4) control our elections by owning the companies that make our voting machines and owning the companies that count the votes for the U.S. elections, 5) destroy our military by numerous experimental vaccinations, white phosphorous, agent orange, depleted uranium, easy availability of drugs including cocaine, LSD, marijuana,
- 6) giving U.S. troops strong drug medications such as Prozac, Zoloft, and others that make them into zombies,
- 7) destroy Christianity in the U.S. and throughout the world by the promotion of degeneracy, homosexuality, promiscuity, pornography, and anti-Christian themes in movies, on television, and on the internet.
Christians are ignorantly and stupidly funding their own demise! And the Jews are laughing it up behind their backs.
Not all Israel is Israel
When the Jews returned to Jerusalem from Babylon, they took back Babylonian names and practices. Babylon was the center of Satanic magic and pagan worship. [Magi, astrology and secret Masonic like rituals.] It has been suggested that there are two types of Jews since that time. One is called the Jew/Zionist, who celebrates the Feast of Purim; and the other one is called the Judahite/Yahwehist who celebrates the Feasts of Yahweh . Why did Yahweh let Esther be included in the, canon? Well, I think it is for those seeking to learn the origin of the evil happenings In the last days. Just look at the days of the Feast of Purim [Esther 9:21].
Sense of immediate extermination
This sense of imminent extermination that comes with Purim is ingrained in the Jewish psyche and is used to manipulate them and justify any behavior. Intelligence gathering tells me to expect that Zionist Israelies Will Strike Iran one of these years on the Illuminati’s Kabbalah Holiday of Purim, a Day of Vengeance on Persia. “The Book of Esther” was exchanged between the United States of America and the State of Israel with an official handoff in talks about Iran with Obama and Netanyahu. In June of 2004
Madonna, due to her involvement in the mystic religion of the Kabbalah, (Lucifer’s twisted version of the Hebrew faith”), publicly announced that she “Wants to be called Esther“.
Purim, a celebration about
compromising your faith
We all know people who’ve cut off their primary spiritual avenues to יהוה because of unbelief and rebellion, people who refuse to return. Consequently, inferior paths of rescue remain the only ones open to them, this is the context of Purim. A very nationalistic nonspiritual tale exactly like Hanukkah!
It teaches us that it is OK to spiritually marry yourself to a pagan deity – to a demon – in order to rescue yourself from a situation caused by your own apostasy! Esther and Mordecai should have been in Judea, not Babylon!
A lesson for us today. They remained in Persia, clinging to their religion, but refusing to return home, they did the ‘next best thing’ and had to face tough choices based on that decision.What we will do if given the opportunity to return to Israel? Comfort and opulence in the exile, or community and conviction in the land? If we follow the Esther model, we won’t make it.
The Esther model is for those who have been disobedient and are trying to get rescued from a life-threatening situation having chosen to be in the wrong place. Many of our Christian brethren, in fact, the vast majority – are going to find themselves in that situation when the secret rapture fails to materialize and the antichrist system starts rounding them up and deporting them to FEMA camps for mass extermination. Will we heed YHWH and go to the 12 cities of refuge or refuse and have our own Purim party?
The word “pûr”, which in Esther 3:7 and 9:24.26 is said to mean “lot”, it’s not even a Hebrew word, but is from the Assyrian “puru”, which means a pebble or small stone, which would be used for casting lots rather like a dice. Will you put throw the dice and put your faith in yourself, the arm of flesh, a president, Guns and weapons, or… are we going to put our faith in the Kingdom, our King, and obey Kingdom Law?
The 13th of the month of Adar, the date on which the Fast of Esther falls, has a history of both jubilant and mournful day, so which is it?
During the early Maccabean era, the 13th of Adar was not the Fast of Esther, but the Feast of Nicanor – at the time one of the happiest holidays in the Jewish calendar. So who was this Nicanor, why did he merit such an illustrious feast, and were did it go? First Maccabees reports that not long after the events commemorating Hanukkah, King Demetrius, nephew of Antiochus Epiphanies, dispatched his Jew-hating general Nicanor on a mission to slaughter Judah Maccabee and “The People” once and for all.
The fateful battle between Judah and Nicanor took place on the 13th of Adar. But, things didn’t turn out as planned: the Jews routed the army of Nicanor, who himself fell in the battle, his head placed on a spike in Jerusalem.
Nicanor’s Day was decreed in the Second Book of Maccabees as a feast to celebrate this deliverance, and was widely observed in the Land of Israel over the next two centuries -until the destruction of the Temple.
YET DESPITE its one time prominence, this feast has vanished from the Jewish calendar. What happened to Nicanor’s day? And how could such a happy occasion be celebrated on the 13th of Adar in the first place? Wasn’t this particular date in the Jewish calendar already taken, and by a well-known fast day, the fast of Esther? Hmm very suspicious!
Apparently because until Maccabean times, neither Purim nor the fast that precedes it are mentioned anywhere outside of the Book of Esther (which Jewish tradition dates to the 5th century BCE, but was probably written around the time of the first Hanukka). In fact, it would be three centuries before the word “Purim” is first coined – in the Mishnah….
But it gets worse for those arguing for Purim’s historicity: The single hint of an emergent proto-Purim is found in the decree in the Book of Second Maccabees, announcing the Feast of Nicanor on Adar 13th. The text notes that the feast falls one day before a certain “Mordecai Day,” a previously unmentioned, but obvious precursor of Purim.
I think because the early rabbis wanted to de-emphasize all things Hasmonean, especially anything that glorified the Maccabee’s military victories, in part because these rabbis played no known role in those victories or in the liberation of the Temple they brought about, and in part because the Hasmonean dynasty usurped the kingship and the Zadokite priesthood. So they replaced Nicanor’s day with a fast and Marduk’s day -PURIM!
Josephus doesn’t use the term Purim, but says that the Jews call the two days “phoureas”. This Greek word is based on the verb ‘phoureó’, meaning ‘guard’ or ‘protect’. I’m realizing Purim serves Jewish/Khazarian nationalistic agendas (such as Zionism) better than it does spiritual ones.
It fits in no divine pattern of the redemption of man from sin by messiah but rather tends to encourage revenge killing that has no part of the New Covenant.
יהוה has declared that we are not to take revenge on our enemies.
The spiritual fruits of Purim and Hanukkah observance led first to the sacking of the Zadokites, then Hellenistic Greek control, and then Herdoian Roman control. Today’s modern Zionists are following in the same tradition. Halting any hope of a Zadokite Priesthood terrorism birthed by Irgun and other PLO- and Hamas like groups against the British, Arabs and the real Yahudim – The Fellahin (Middle Eastern Peasant)- now transformed by the Zionists into ‘Palestinians’.
(founders of the State of Israel, David Ben Gurion and Yitzhak BenZevi).
Later followed a military ‘war of independence’ which hasn’t created biblical Israel or peace in the Middle East. The Zionist State, antichrist as it is, is threatened by the same kind of terrorism by militant Muslims as it used on the British, Fellahin which were the biblical Israelites and Judahites. The Elohim of Israel has patiently waited for the modern State of Israel to produce the fruits of Messiah, they haven’t – Lk 13:6, so is He with them?
Esther and her guardian Mordecai, were in violation of Torah which forbade the giving away of Israelite daughters to pagans, such a crime against יהוה that later Ezra demanded the returning exiles to divorce their pagan wives taken in Babylonian captivity. Should we accept any compromise with יהוה laws on marriage?
Look at the pagan connections/pagan deities: Esther to the Babylonian goddess Ishtar; Mordecai to the Babylonian god Marduk; Haman to the Elamite deity, Humman; Vashti to the Elamite goddess Mashti. Two sets of gods and goddesses representing two different cultures: Babylonian and Elamite.
I’m thinking YHWH has a better way for us! Purim celebrates a lesser path, one we’re not called to!
Purim’s setting has resemblances to a pagan power contest between the gods – between the deities of Babylon and Persia. Did יהוה inspire the book of Esther to be written this way as an object lesson in compromise? He inspired Caiaphas to prophesy the death of Yeshua for the salvation of the nation, though Caiaphas got the wrong end of the stick and misunderstood. Could it be that יהוה inspired this event especially for those whom He knew would opt for a lesser path – a path of compromise? Do you still want to Purim party with the Khazar’s? I don’t.
Conclusion: It seems to me that the holiday later known as Purim arose in the long established Babylonian/Persian Diaspora, as a Jewish adaptation of a Persian end-of-winter masquerade celebration, similar to Europe’s Carnivale and Louisiana’s Mardi Gras.
I believe יהוה allowed this book into the scripture to reveal the tactics of our enemy the serpent seed, the synagogue of Satan in the last days, where Zionism denies the existence of the Israelite people, whom they consider simply as the bridgehead of a Jewish people engaged in colonization combined with fragments of an occult nationalized religion.
Edomite Jewish slogans for Purim found in their holy books
“Kill the Goyim by any means possible.”
Choshen Ha’mishpat 425:50
“Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious [non-Jews] is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God.”
“Extermination of the Christians is a necessary sacrifice.”
“Tob shebbe goyyim harog – Even the best of the Goyim (Gentiles) should be killed.”
Soferim 15, Rule 10
The Word “Jew” isn’t in the bible
The word “Jew” never appears in the Bible, either in the Old Testament or the New Testament. The word is always Yehuwdiy in the Hebrew, meaning, as shown above, a “worshipper of Yehovah (Jehovah – God) and in the Greek, Judean or Judahite – again, meaning a worshipper of the God who resided in the temple in Jerusalem in Judea (Judean), or a worshipper of Jesus Christ who came from the tribe of Judah (Judahite). These terms were generally synonymous with the word Israelites – those who lived in the area of Judea, or were descended from the tribe of Judah, or worshipped the God who resided in the temple in Jerusalem (in Judea) and worshipped Jesus Christ, a descendant of the tribe of Judah.
Michael Collins Piper – Purim and Anti-Christian Hostility